Taal



Valuta

Wat is PubChem en wat is een PubChem CID?

A public chemical database

PubChem is a public chemical database maintained by the US National Center for Biotechnology Information. It combines structures, names, identifiers and linked information from many sources.

This topic is closely related to What is a CAS number? and What are InChI and InChIKey?, which provide additional context for the interpretation and characterization of chemical materials.

What is a PubChem CID?

CID means Compound Identifier and identifies a standardised Compound record in PubChem. It is not the same identifier system as a CAS Registry Number.

Compound and Substance

PubChem distinguishes deposited Substance records from standardised Compound records. Several source records can point to the same standardised structure.

Which data are available?

Records can contain formula, molecular weight, IUPAC name, SMILES, InChI, InChIKey, synonyms and external references. Available fields vary by compound.

Stereochemistry and salt form

A defined stereoisomer or salt can be represented differently from an unspecified or neutral structure. The drawn structure should therefore be checked alongside the CID.

Identity and exact chemical form

Chemical identity involves more than a name. Formula, molar mass, salt or free form, stereochemistry and, where relevant, hydration or solvation should all refer to the same chemical entity. A mismatch between these fields is an important reason to recheck source data.

Database data versus batch analysis

Databases describe chemical entities and collect reference information. A Certificate of Analysis, by contrast, generally reports measurements for a specific batch. Correct database identity therefore does not automatically prove the composition or purity of physical material.

Why cross-check several fields?

A robust check compares name, CAS number, PubChem record, formula, mass and structural identifiers. When several independent fields consistently describe the same form, documentation becomes more reliable. Contradictions deserve additional attention.

Analytical context

A measurement gains meaning from the method, sample and conditions. HPLC, LC-MS, NMR, FTIR and solid-state techniques provide different kinds of information and should not be treated as interchangeable evidence.

A common documentation error

A frequent error is combining data for closely related but non-identical forms, such as a free base with the molar mass of a hydrochloride or an unspecified structure with a stereospecific identifier. Cross-checking is particularly useful for finding such errors.

Technical documentation

SDS, TDS and CoA serve different functions. An SDS primarily addresses safety, a TDS technical characteristics and a CoA batch-specific test results. The same type of value can therefore have a different context in different documents.

Limits of a single source

No database, identifier or analytical technique automatically describes every aspect of a material. Molecular structure, chemical purity, water content and solid-state form are different information levels. Strong assessment uses information appropriate to the actual question.

Practical conclusion

Most errors are avoided by not relying on one prominent number or one name. Check whether the different data are mutually consistent, distinguish structural identity from experimental batch data, and use complementary analysis when the question requires it.

Cookie-toestemming Manage cookies